Tuesday, August 21, 2012

women usually....

Uh-oh!  ;-)

Poor Mark -- he may have opened a can of worms today.  Granted it was more of an "intro to" than a "definitive guide," but when he started describing female fat physiology, i started ticking off items -- one after another -- that not only fail to describe my body NOW, but consistently fail to describe its performance EVER.

You know where the most annoyingly persistent fat is on my body?  The upper back.  Where i lose fat first?  My hips.  Where i'd LOVE to lose some weight, and can't seem to?  My boobs.

I've always had a comparatively flat stomach, though two pregnancies and an abdominal surgery have left it looking rather like a weathered WWI battlefield.  My legs are almost embarrassingly muscular, and i have a strong butt and longisimus dorsi muscles (tenderloin).  My flexed biceps promise more power than my upper body actually has, and my lower arms both promise and deliver strength.  In my slender youth, i never had a "nipped" waist, but it's decently defined now.

But i sweartogod i'm a woman....

(One that hates generalizations.)

6 comments:

  1. I feel a little guilty about commenting on that one. No need to quibble with what one commentor called "God's design"....its.just God seems to have designed inter-sexed ppl too. The only people.interested in writing about that seems to be outlier scientests. Oh well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i swear, i sometimes think Nature was on a bender when i was designed....

      Delete
  2. Whaaaa? Eades just posted! Woohoo!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. :-) well, it's about blood time!!!

      Delete
    2. bloodY. hate it when the keyboard doesn't "take" a stroke, and i don't catch it till later.... :-P

      Delete